After reading Chapter 2 of
Connell's Masculinities, I agreed
with the assessment made that the differences in the sexes are due to biology.
Connell also describes it well by stating, "The account of natural
masculinity that has been built up in sociobiology is almost entirely
fictional. It presupposes broad differences in the character traits and
behaviors of women and men." This statement got me thinking about my own
so called masculinity. I am an aggressive person by nature, but now I am
wondering if I was socially constructed by those around me to somehow subliminally
believe that I should act more aggressive. I don't understand if the increased
amount of testosterone in grown men cause them to be increasingly aggressive.
If this was true then gay men would exhibit lower levels of testosterone since
many people believe gay men are less masculine. However, I still do not understand
why society believes men are biologically more aggressive than women. My mother
is a very aggressive driver. She cuts people off, flashes her high beams, and
speeds. However, when she is not driving she is a very sweet, FEMININE, person.
Thus I do not understand the biological argument that explains masculinity.
I also do not understand why
masculinity cannot exist without femininity. In history society has always
attempted to separate the sexes. There has been the working sphere for the men,
and the home sphere for the women. Men were out working, while the women were
cooking and cleaning at home. The words feminine and masculine define
characteristics that describe women and men. Thus the words themselves cannot
exist without the other. Masculinity is the opposite of femininity and
femininity is the opposite of masculinity. I find it amazing how society has
attempted to separate people based on their race, class, and sex. Even though
it seems everyone is in the society as equal beings there are still remnants of
discrimination and sexism, which bring society down.
No comments:
Post a Comment