This week, I found a article titled “Boys
do better than girls when taught under traditional reading methods” written on
March 21st, 2007. This is the link: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23389856-boys-do-better-than-girls-when-taught-under-traditional-reading-methods.do
As the title tells all, this article
basically says that boys perform better than girls when they are taught under
traditional reading methods. The ‘traditional reading methods’ was basically
reading in class. Hence, the article says that the results of an experiment demonstrated
that boys were likely to have a better understanding of the readings than the
girls.
I found this article a little bit
ridiculous because now the male and female genders are being divided
critically. It seems like the media/studies are trying to form a game of ‘boys
against girls’. I don’t get why people have to do these studies that show which
gender is better than the other. Especially when it comes to studying. I thought
that this experiment was very off and inaccurate because I personally believe
that the reading skills may vary by individuals and not gender. The reading
skills may highly vary on the individual’s background, ability to focus, etc,
and I don’t think it’s fair to have a limited amount of boys and girls take
that test. The experiment therefore, to me, does not seem very trustworthy. As
I mentioned before in my other blog post, I think that these sorts of articles
make the distinction between male and female. Therefore, as these distinctions
grow in our society, gender stereotypes become more powerful and dominant.
Hence, it would be encouraging to society when experiments that differentiate
male and female be less supported.
No comments:
Post a Comment